Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 10:45
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Instant analysis: Andreyanov has impressed CBJ brass - NHL.com
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Russia can stop this any time.
Thank you.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Long-term study ties midlife vascular health to later dementia risk - Medical Xpress
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Where Seattle Mariners stand in All-Star voting - Seattle Sports
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Why do you think Filipinos are conservatives?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Margaret Cho: Ellen DeGeneres 'Not Nice to Me for Most of My Career' - Variety
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear: